The need to change the policy to correct the affairs/ confusion of industries in the new structure
A few months have passed since the reform of the structure of the Ministry of Industry and the subsequent change of the general policies of this ministry regarding export and import and of course production, policies which are successful in some areas, have not shown to be very efficient in many cases, especially in the area of production.
According to Khodrocar, after a few months of reforming some structures in the Ministry of industry, it was expected that these changes would lead to good things, at least in the important and large industries of the country, but what is certain to this day is this reform of structures, which by the way, has led to many failures. The experts and elites of this field were considered correct and calculated, but still could not be implemented in the body of the Ministry of Secrecy and even the macro-policies of this Ministry.
A clear example of this can be seen in the creation of the vice-chancellor of transportation without eliminating IDRO’s automotive activities. At this time, not only is IDRO still involved in the structure of automobile policies, but it even sees the Deputy Ministry of Transportation under its portfolio, which is not clear, despite the creation of a structure equal to the Deputy Ministry of indsutry with the same title, what activity it is doing now should not be parallel work.
This change in structure has not been properly implemented even in other vice-departments, and sometimes we see parallel work and even differences in procedures.
The establishment of the Vice-President of General Industries and the division of the former Vice-President of Industries and Economic Affairs of this ministry have not yet separated some activities correctly, and we are still witnessing the emergence of differences in tastes and even work habits in this department.
For example, the activity of a car parts manufacturing unit is now managed under the supervision of the transportation deputy, or the industries deputy, the business deputy, or even IDRO!
What is certain is that this confusion and the lack of proper segregation of duties harms important industries including automobiles, and the multiple policies that exist among the various vice-departments of the Ministry of industry definitely hinder the rapid and forward movement of those industries in this situation.
A clear example of this can be seen in the creation of the vice-chancellor of transportation without eliminating IDRO’s automotive activities. At this time, not only is IDRO still involved in the structure of automobile policies, but it even sees the Deputy Ministry of Transportation under its portfolio, which is not clear, despite the creation of a structure equal to the Deputy Ministry of indsutry with the same title, what activity it is doing now should not be parallel work.
This change in structure has not been properly implemented even in other vice-departments, and sometimes we see parallel work and even differences in procedures.
The establishment of the Vice-President of General Industries and the division of the former Vice-President of Industries and Economic Affairs of this ministry have not yet separated some activities correctly, and we are still witnessing the emergence of differences in tastes and even work habits in this department.
For example, the activity of a car parts manufacturing unit is now managed under the supervision of the transportation deputy, or the industries deputy, the business deputy, or even IDRO!
What is certain is that this confusion and the lack of proper segregation of duties harms important industries including automobiles, and the multiple policies that exist among the various vice-departments of the Ministry of industry definitely hinder the rapid and forward movement of those industries in this situation.
Latest News